You’ll notice that throughout this site, we will refer to either Dynamics 365 for Finance & Operations, Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (without the “for”), or D365 F&O. We stick pretty rigidly to this nomenclature, in line with Microsoft’s own Finance and operations application documentation, but there’s some ambiguity in the market, so we thought it deserved a brief explanation.

The platform has had different names over the years:

  • 1998: IBM Axapta
  • 2000: Axapta
  • 2002: Microsoft Axapta
  • 2006: Microsoft Dynamics AX
  • 2016: Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Operations (D365O)
  • 2017: Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance & Operations (D365 F&O)
Screenshot of the top banner in D365 F&O
A screenshot of the top banner of D365 F&O (taken January 2024)

In 2020, the licensing for the product split, making it possible to purchase…

  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, and
  • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management (D365 SCM)

…separately. This has led to some people, including occasional Microsoft employees, referring to the combined platform as D365 FSCM or D365 F&SCM.

The problem is, the term D365 FSCM is flawed, because there are actually four licensable products within the platform:

  • Dynamics 365 Finance1
  • Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
  • Dynamics 365 Commerce
  • Dynamics 365 Human Resources

With this logic, the acronym should be D365 FSCMCHR, or some other alpha-spaghetti combination of those initials, which is clearly ridiculous!

Furthermore, as there’s almost no use of the term “D365 FSCM” on any official Microsoft webpage2, we’re sticking with D365 F&O, to be fully inclusive.

There’s a very real chance that in the future, we’ll see a change to the architecture, application names, and further wholesales changes to the platform in general – likely all three. If you know, you know. But until then, it’s still D365 F&O!

  1. There’s now a Finance Premium option too, but that’s for a future post. ↩︎
  2. We’ve only found two exceptions, (i) this FastTrack page on GitHub, and (ii) this MS Docs page, which is actually about Oracle PeopleSoft! Any references on AppSource don’t count, as descriptions aren’t written by Microsoft. ↩︎
A screenshot of the D365 F&O loading screen (taken January 2024)

Published by Mike Pearsall

Mike is a founding editor of AX7 - The D365 F&O Blog. He is a business and solution architect with experience of successfully implementing D365 F&O on both client and partner side, as well as strong knowledge of the wider D365 suite and Power Platform.

Join the conversation

4 Comments

  1. Hi Mike!

    Nice article. Pretty sure it was Corcorde XAL, then Damgaard Axapta before Axapta 3.0, but I don’t recall IBM Axapta . Navision and Damgaard merged in Denmark before they were sold to Microsoft.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *